Reflexive Hybrid Public Identity: Negotiating Modernity through Capital Conversion among Madurese Santri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/islamikainside.v12i1.368Keywords:
Public religiosity, santri social roles, cultural and symbolic capital, reflexive agency, reflexive hybrid public identityAbstract
This article examines how expanding social roles reconstruct the public religious identity of Madurese santri. Rather than measuring expansion by the number of occupations, it analyzes the qualitative shift from pesantren-centered piety to participation in education, community organizations, economic initiatives, politics, government, and digital publics. A qualitative single-case study was conducted at Pesantren Mambaul Ulum Bata-Bata in Madura in 2025. Data were generated through in-depth interviews with resident santri, alumni, and ustad, supported by participant observation and institutional documentation. The analysis integrates Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital, and field; Giddens' reflexive agency; Hall's identity as positioning; and Bhabha's in-between space. The findings demonstrate four connected movements: the translation of personal piety into public usefulness through khairu al-nasi anfa'uhum li-al-nasi; the conversion of religious knowledge, discipline, networks, and moral reputation into resources recognized in differentiated social fields; reflexive negotiation amid value conflict, competence demands, and public scrutiny; and the formation of an identity that is neither wholly traditional nor uncritically modern. The article conceptualizes this formation as a reflexive hybrid public identity: an institutionally rooted, field-responsive, and service-oriented identity produced through active positioning in public life. It also develops digital religious habitus to explain how pesantren dispositions are reformulated within platform-mediated religious communication.References
Abdullah, Abdullah, and Lailatul Mundiro Muawaroh. “Transformasi Peran Pesantren Sebagai Agen Sosial-Religius: Pertautan Tradisi dan Modernitas dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Madura.” EL-BANAT: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam 14, no. 1 (June 2024): 149–67. https://doi.org/10.54180/elbanat.2024.14.1.149-167.
Abidin, Min Hajul, and Yang Dong. “The Value of Santri in Political Moments: An Identity.” Santri: Journal of Pesantren and Fiqh Sosial 1, no. 2 (December 2020): 107–20. https://doi.org/10.35878/santri.v1i2.237.
Adams, Matthew. “Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: Towards an Understanding of Contemporary Identity?” Sociology 40, no. 3 (June 2006): 511–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850663672.
Akram, Sadiya, and Anthony Hogan. “On Reflexivity and the Conduct of the Self in Everyday Life: Reflections on Bourdieu and Archer.” The British Journal of Sociology 66, no. 4 (December 2015): 605–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12150.
Ammerman, Nancy T. “Rethinking Religion: Toward a Practice Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 126, no. 1 (July 2020): 6–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/709779.
Bhabha, Homi Kharshedji. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Forms of Capital. New York: Greenwood Pres, 1983.
___________. The Logic of Practice. California: Stanford University Press, 1990.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, no. 3 (July 2021): 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
Campbell, Heidi A., and Giulia Evolvi. “Contextualizing Current Digital Religion Research on Emerging Technologies.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, no. 1 (January 2020): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149.
Casanova, José. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Crossley, Nick. “From Reproduction to Transformation: Social Movement Fields and the Radical Habitus.” Theory, Culture & Society 20, no. 6 (December 2003): 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403206003.
Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Pandangan Hidup Kyai Dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2011.
Djakfar, Fera Andriani, and Puspita Ayu Permatasari. “Ngabulâ Vis-À-Vis Modernity: Tabarruk Practice in Bangkalan Pesantren.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 28, no. 2 (December 2020): 337–62. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v28i2.4026.
Fathonah, Siti, Rhesa Zuhriya Briyan Pratiwi, and Ulfa Fauzia Argestya. “Negotiating Santri Identity in Electoral Politics: Political Image Construction in the 2024 Indonesian Election.” Khazanah Sosial 7, no. 2 (August 2025): 425–48. https://doi.org/10.15575/ks.v7i2.38312.
Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press, 1991.
Hall, Stuart. Who Needs Identity? In Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage Publications, 1996.
Hidayah, Siti Nur. “Pesantren for Middle-Class Muslims in Indonesia (Between Religious Commodification and Pious Neoliberalism).” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 9, no. 1 (July 2021): 209. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v9i1.7641.
Hirschkind, Charles. “Civic Virtue and Religious Reason: An Islamic Counterpublic.” Cultural Anthropology 16, no. 1 (February 2001): 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2001.16.1.3.
Isbah, M. Falikul. “Pesantren in the Changing Indonesian Context: History and Current Developments.” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 8, no. 1 (June 2020): 65. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i1.5629.
Kapinga, Laura, Bettina Van Hoven, Bettina B. Bock, and Peter Hopkins. “Young Muslims’ Religious Identities in Relation to Places Beyond the UK: A Qualitative Map-Making Technique in Newcastle Upon Tyne.” Children’s Geographies 21, no. 4 (July 2023): 609–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2022.2100691.
Kholili, M., Ahmad Izudin, and Muhammad Lutfi Hakim. “Islamic Proselytizing in Digital Religion in Indonesia: The Challenges of Broadcasting Regulation.” Cogent Social Sciences 10, no. 1 (December 2024): 2357460. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2357460.
Lam, Kim, and Fethi Mansouri. “Beyond (Mis)-Recognition: Muslim Youth and Religiosity in Australia.” Journal of Youth Studies 24, no. 6 (July 2021): 765–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1766667.
Mahmood, Saba. “Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival.” Cultural Anthropology 16, no. 2 (May 2001): 202–36. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2001.16.2.202.
Muthohirin, Nafik. “Da’wa in Social Media: The Views of Ustad Hanan Attaki and Felix Siauw to the Hijrah Phenomenon.” Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies 17, no. 2 (December 2021): 249–70. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v17i2.12671.
Pabbajah, Mustaqim, Hasse Jubba, Irwan Abdullah, M. Taufiq Hidayat Pabbajah, and Juhansar. “From the Scriptural to the Virtual: Indonesian Engineering Students Responses to the Digitalization of Islamic Education.” Teaching Theology & Religion 24, no. 2 (June 2021): 122–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12581.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. New York: SAGE Publications, 2002.
Priori, Andrea, Eva Gerharz, and Abantee Harun. “Claiming Space in Civil Society. Young Muslim Moral Personhoods in Bangladesh and Italy.” Journal of Civil Society 20, no. 3 (July 2024): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2024.2379374.
Rosyad, Rifki, Dede Aji Mardani, and Wan Zailan Kamaruddin Wan Ali. “Living Work Ethics of Muslim Entrepreneurs in Tasikmalaya City, Indonesia.” Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Lintas Budaya 6, no. 1 (June 2022): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v6i1.16739.
Salam-Salmaoui, Rauha, Shajee Hassan, and Shazrah Salam. “Virtual Madrasas: Digital Governmentality and the Shaping of Islamic Subjectivity in Pakistan.” Journal of Media and Religion 24, no. 2 (April 2025): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2025.2468455.
Schielke, Samuli. “Being Good in Ramadan: Ambivalence, Fragmentation, and the Moral Self in the Lives of Young Egyptians.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15, no. s1 (May 2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01540.x.
Setia, Paelani, and Rika Dilawati. “Religiosity in the Digital Era and the Challenges of Hoaxes, Post-Truth and Radicalism on Social Media.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 4, no. 1 (March 2024): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v4i1.33230.
Sodiqin, Ali, and Nur Komala. “The Resilience of Madurese Santri in Facing Modernity: A Study of the Indonesian Ngabuleh Tradition.” IBDA’: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya 20, no. 1 (April 2022): 76–94. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v20i1.5390.
Zainuddin, Zainuddin, Ani Nafisah, Mustafiyanti Mustafiyanti, and Davik Davik. “Pesantren and the Political Authority of Kiai: The Dialectic of Religion, Power, and Education.” Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education 7, no. 2 (February 2026). https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v7i2.2115
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hairus Saleh, Shofiatul Jannah, Shujaur Rahman (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
Read more: License and Copyright
