Reconstructing Management Epistemology through Maqasid al-Shariah: Towards an Integrative Framework Beyond Positivism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/islamikainside.v12i1.372Keywords:
Management epistemology, Maqasid al-shariah, Islamic epistemology, beyond positivism, integrative epistemological frameworkAbstract
The dominance of positivist epistemology has profoundly shaped management science by privileging empirical objectivity, instrumental rationality, and value-neutral inquiry as the primary standards of scientific legitimacy. While this paradigm has contributed substantially to methodological rigor, it has also marginalized ethical, spiritual, and teleological dimensions that are essential for understanding complex organizational realities. Existing studies commonly employ maqasid al-shariah as a normative framework for evaluating managerial practices; however, its potential as a foundation for reconstructing management epistemology remains underdeveloped. This study aims to reconstruct the epistemological foundations of management science through maqasid al-shariah by developing an integrative epistemological framework that transcends the limitations of positivism. Employing an integrative conceptual synthesis, the study combines thematic analysis, comparative epistemological analysis, and conceptual reconstruction to critically examine positivist assumptions and synthesize alternative epistemic foundations derived from Islamic epistemology and maqasid al-shariah. The findings demonstrate that maqasid al-shariah should not be understood merely as an ethical framework but as an epistemic principle governing the construction, interpretation, validation, and application of management knowledge. The proposed framework integrates revelation, reason, and empirical inquiry into a coherent epistemological architecture that preserves the analytical strengths of empirical investigation while embedding knowledge production within the higher objectives of Islamic thought. Rather than replacing positivism, the framework reconstructs its epistemological boundaries by incorporating ethical rationality and purposive knowledge into scientific inquiry. This study contributes to the philosophy of management by offering an original integrative epistemological framework that enriches contemporary debates on management epistemology, Islamic philosophy of knowledge, and epistemological pluralism beyond positivist assumptions.
References
Audah, J. (2013). Al-Maqasid Untuk Pemula (M. Affan (ed.)). SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Block, J. H., & al., et. (2023). Replication Studies in Management Research: Current State and Future Prospects. Journal of Management Control. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-022-00344-0
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann.
Busenbark, J. R., & al., et. (2022). Endogeneity in Management Research: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions. Journal of Management.
Choudhury, M. A. (2018). Tawhidi Epistemology and Its Applications. Humanomics. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-05-2017-0035
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dasmadi, Hadi, S., Junchu, Y., & Wahyuningtyas, N. (2025). Maqasid Shariah and Organizational Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 12(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.14421/grieb.2024.122-03
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a Theory of Spiritual Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558
Golesorkhi, S., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2019). Introduction to the Special Issue: What is Strategy as Practice? Academy of Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0150
Hadi, S., Iswantoro, I. Y., Purnasari, E., Wahyuningtiyas, N., & Andleeb, N. (2022). Maqasid Shariah (Pentagon-Shaped Ethical Measurement) Establish Organizational Performance: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Islamic Economics and Social Science (JIESS), 3(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.22441/jiess.2022.v3i2.005
Hendar, J. (2023). Maqashid Sharia As The Basis For Decision Making Of Corporate Social Responsibility Based On A Prophetic Legal Paradigm. Prophetic Law Review, 5(1), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol5.iss1.art6
Hensel, P. G. (2021). Open Science Practices in Management Research. Management Review Quarterly.
Hiquet, J., Wordley, C., & Ansari, S. (2023). Measurement, Values, and the Limits of Quantification in Management Research. Management and Business Review.
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
Jannah, A. N., & Rahmawati, D. (2025). Rekonseptualisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Metode Ilmiah dalam Perspektif Kontemporer. Jurnal Riset Manajemen. https://doi.org/10.54066/jurma.v3i4.3633
Kamla, R. (2019). Critical insights into Islamic accounting. Accounting Forum. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2019.1589905
Karimullah, S. S. (2023). Exploration of Maqasid Al-Shariah Concepts in The Development of Islamic Economic Policies. Mu’amalah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 2(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.32332/muamalah.v2i2.7747
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (2017). Ethics: The Failure of Positivist Science. The Review of Higher Education, 12, 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1989.0017
Mahadevan, J. (2024). Paradigm Boundaries and Knowledge Production in Cross-Cultural Management Research. Management Learning.
Mertens, W., Recker, J., Kohlborn, T., & Kummer, T. (2022). A Framework for the Study of Cultural Perspectives in Management. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130123
Mustofa, M. (2024). Epistemological Paradigms in Educational Research. Journal of Office Administration. https://doi.org/10.26740/joaep.v3n3.p214-224
Nurcahyo, S. A., Jannah, R., & Anis, M. (2024). Maqasid Syariah Management in Realizing Sustainable Development Goals: Perspective of the Halal Tourism Industry. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21580/jdmhi.2024.6.2.23093
Nurzaman, M. S. (2019). Pengantar Ekonomi Islam Sebuah pendektan Metodolgi. Salemba Diniyah.
Oktavia, Y., & Putra, I. G. N. (2024). Kritik terhadap Positivisme dalam Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i2.77105
Prasojo, Yadiati, W., Fitrijanti, T., & Sueb, M. (2022). The relationship between risk-taking and maqasid shariah-based performance in Islamic banks: Does shariah governance matter? Banks and Bank Systems, 17(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(1).2022.12
Puspasari, S. A. (2023). Paradigm of Post-Positivism, Critical Theory, and Constructivism. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i12.12502
Qomar, M. N., Hidayati, A., & Nafi’uddin, N. (2022). Using Epistemology to Hack Islamic Management. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i1.4512
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the Logic of Practice: Theorizing Through Practical Rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338–360. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330942
Skačkauskienė, I. (2022). Research on Management Theory: A Development Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127354
T.M, T. S., & Ismail. (2021). Cultivating a Maqasid al-Shariah Based Decisions Making in Islamic Organization Management. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization, 6(S2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijhtc.v6i(S2).6242
Telkamp, J. (2023). Ethical disagreements in technology and management research. https://doi.org/10.31274/td-20240329-291
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Uduma, I. A., & Sylva, W. (2015). A Critique Of The Adequacy Of Positivist And Interpretivist Views Of Organisational Studies For Understanding The 21 Century Organisation(S). https://consensus.app/papers/a-critique-of-the-adequacy-of-positivist-and-uduma-sylva/d0d1b97b54bf5c2b8f5f77eb6e4eddc1/
Utami, D. R. (2024). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Tahun 2022 dengan Pendekatan Maqasid Syariah Index (MSI). PENG: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(2), 2057–2071. https://doi.org/10.62710/783fy474
Wahyudi, I., & Mahaswa, A. (2021). Epistemic Fallacy dalam Perspektif Realisme Kritis Roy Bhaskar. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i1.31611
Yamanoi, J. (2021). The Development and Future of Management Research: Quantitative Dominance and Methodological Challenges. Soshiki Kagaku (Organizational Science), 54(4).
Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irfan Harmoko, Abdelmounaim Graiguer (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
Read more: License and Copyright
